screen capture program like techsmith knowmia H u m a n i t i e s
Create presentation slides for the topic below, there is no need for you to record it just make the slides as well as additional notes for each slide on a seperate document
Step 2: Select a topic from one of the 3 choices listed below. The main objective is to communicate clear and accurate information in an engaging presentation for your peers.
topic is ” Breaking the Glass Ceiling in Men’s Sport: Women’s Barriers, Challenges and Successes in Entering Professional Sport”
Step 3: Create your presentation using a presentation program like Google Slides or PowerPoint.
Step 4: Record and create a video of your presentation by using the ZOOM recording feature or a screen capture program like Techsmith Knowmia or Screencastify. The video should be 5-8 minutes in length.
Step 5: Submit your video presentation by Nov. 8th.
Rubric
Group Presentation
Group Presentation
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentDid the presentation have factual material?
|
| 5.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Presentation had an exceptional amount of fact based material and was extremely beneficial to the class. Included references for all material/information.
|
3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Presentation had mostly fact based material and provided a benefit to the class. Included some references.
|
0.0 pts
Below Expectations
Presentation contained little to no fact based material. No references included.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizationWas the presentation well organized and easy to follow?
|
| 5.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
The presentation was well organized, well prepared and easy to follow.
|
3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
The presentation had organized ideas but could have been much stronger with better preparation.
|
0.0 pts
Below Expectations
The presentation lacked organization and had little evidence of preparation.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentationDid the presenters speak clearly? Did they engage the audience? Was it obvious the material had been rehearsed?
|
| 5.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Presenters were all very confident in delivery. Preparation is very evident
|
3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Presenters were somewhat confident with their presentation; however, the presentation was not as engaging as it could have been.
|
0.0 pts
Below Expectations
Presenters lacked confidence and demonstrated little evidence of planning/rehearsal.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCollaborationDid everyone contribute to the presentation? Did everyone seem well versed in the material?
|
| 5.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Evident that all of the group members contributed equally to the presentation, did not read directly from the slide and knew their topics/slides.
|
3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Appeared that some people did more work than others, and a few were not prepared in presenting information on their slides.
|
0.0 pts
Below Expectations
Appeared that only a few worked on the project. Several students read directly from slides and did not know their material.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength and FormatWas the presentation 7-8 minutes long? Were the presentation slides well designed and free of errors?
|
| 5.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
7-8 minutes, presentation design was appropriate and free of errors.
|
3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
5-6 minutes, presentation was distracting at times and contained a few errors.
|
0.0 pts
Below Expectations
Less than 5 minutes, design was distracting and contained more than 5 errors.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 25.0
|
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount