organized collaborative partner powerpoint consisting H e a l t h M e d i c a l

organized collaborative partner powerpoint consisting H e a l t h M e d i c a l

  • Topic: Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program (CUSP) in nursing and healthcare
  • A well-organized collaborative partner PowerPoint consisting of at least 6 slides (excluding title and reference pages
  • At least 2 questions to stimulate audience participation and 2 peer review in the presentation well written in own words
  • Follow rubric
  • Criteria Unacceptable 5 points/section Acceptable 10 points/section Good 15 points/section Exemplary 20 points/section
    Purpose The purpose or argument is generally unclear. The central purpose or argument is not consistently clear throughout the paper. The writing has a clear purpose or argument but may sometimes digress from it. The writer’s central purpose or argument is readily apparent to the reader.
    Content Central purpose or argument is not clearly identified. Analysis is vague or not evident. Information supports a central purpose or argument at times. Analysis is basic or general. Information provides reasonable support for a central purpose or argument and displays evidence of a basic analysis of a significant topic. Balanced presentation of relevant & legitimate information that clearly supports a central purpose or argument and shows a thoughtful in-depth analysis of the case.
    Writer’s position The writing is not logically organized. Frequently, ideas fail to make sense together. The reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and loses interest. In general, the writing is arranged logically, although occasionally ideas fail to make sense together. The reader is fairly clear about what the writer intends. The ideas are arranged logically to support the central purpose or argument. They are usually clearly linked to each other. For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning. Ideas are arranged logically to support the purpose or argument. They flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked to each other. The reader can follow the line of reasoning.
    Structure Errors in sentence structure are frequent enough to be a major distraction to the reader. There are so many errors that meaning is obscured. Inappropriate length of less 2 pages. Errors in APA format Some sentences are awkwardly constructed so that the reader is occasionally distracted. The writing has many errors, and the reader is distracted by them. Inappropriate length consisting of less than 2 pages. Missing elements of APA format Sentences are well-phrased, and there is some variety in length and structure. The flow from sentence to sentence is generally smooth. Occasional errors present, but they do not represent a major distraction or obscure meaning. Minimal error in 7th edition format. Points flow smoothly from one to another. The writing is free or almost free of errors. Appropriate length consisting of at 12 slides.
    References Audience participation References are seldom cited to support statements. No sources are professionally reliable. Lack audience participation Less than 2 professionally reliable sources are given to support claims. Attributions are occasionally given, yet many statements seem unsubstantiated. Most of the references are questionable, such as internet sources or popular magazines. Lack audience participation Compelling evidence from at least 2 professionally reliable sources is given to support claims. Attribution is, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. Fair stimulation of audience participation with at least 2 questions Compelling evidence from at least 2 professionally reliable sources is given to support claims. Attribution is clear and fairly represented. Stimulates audience participation with at least 2 questions

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount