double spaced utilizing 12 point font B u s i n e s s F i n a n c e
The Supreme Court of the United States heard the arguments in the case of Janus vs. AFSCME. This case was argued before SCOTUS in 2018. Your Term Project is to
Research aspects of the case; Janus vs. AFSCME.
1) Know the type of union being discussed. Detail the advantages and disadvantages of this type of union membership.
2) Determine the benefits and challenges for each side, Janus and AFSCME.
3) Understand and explain how the Abood vs. Detroit Board of Education, established a law which maintained precedence since 1977.
4) Research and discuss any additional historically cases which have challenged or supported the 1977 decision.
5) From your research and course learnings determine which side, Janus or AFSCME you support. Do you agree or disagree with the courts decision in the case, why or why not?
Your term project is to prepare arguments in defense of your chosen side, Janus or AFSCME. Detail whether the Abood vs. Detroit Board of Education law should have been upheld or overturned. What would be the impacts of upholding the 1977 decision? What are the impacts of overturning the 1977 law? Chose the side based on your own beliefs, which may not align with the courts rulings.
This is the final project for this course. Therefore, your Term Project should demonstrate a mastery of the complete coursework during the semester. Additionally, the project should be a reflection of your own original work. It should not contain more than a 30% similarity with Turn It In. Failure to submit your own original work will result in failure.
Paper should be 3-4 pages (not including reference page) typed and double spaced utilizing 12 point font. Sources must be cited.
Attached as Word document.
Rubric
HRPO 1305 (1)
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionIntroduction of topic to be discussed. Ability to grab readers attention. Provide thesis statement |
|
5.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistorical Application of the CaseBackground information – 1) thoroughness and accuracy of research 2) Demonstrate understating of complexity of facts and ability to relay facts in organized format |
|
10.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArgument1) Detailed supporting or opposing position. Effectively detail reason for your stance 2) Historical view and future implications 3) Clarity of argument |
|
25.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionEffectively summarize discussed points |
|
5.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizationReadability, overall clarity, proper use of grammar, and use of citations |
|
5.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizationThe project should represent your original work. It should not contain more than a 30% similarity with Turn It In. Failure to submit your own original work will result in failure. |
|
0.0 pts |
||
|
Total Points: 50.0 |
||||
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount