david foster wallace http :// www H u m a n i t i e s
In Rhys Southan’s essay, “Is Art a Waste of Time,” we learned about Effective Altruists (EAs), whose central goal is to reduce suffering and increase the lifespan and happiness of people (and animals) around the world. According to Southan, EAs believe in replaceability, which he described as the following:
“The idea is that the only good that counts is what you accomplish over and above what the next person would have done in your place. In equation form, Your Apparent Good Achieved minus Good Your Counterfactual Replacement would have achieved equals Your Actual Good Achieved” (365).
The idea of living an ethical life is appealing, but complex – how do we achieve that goal? Is using this EA doctrine the best way to ensure a person lives an ethical life? Construct an essay that responds to this question by supporting (agreeing with) the EA doctrine, refuting (disagreeing with) the EA doctrine, or complicating (agreeing with some elements and disagreeing with others) the EA doctrine, drawing evidence and examples from at least two (2) other works, in addition to Southan’s, below.
Main article is Rhys Southan’s essay, “Is Art a Waste of Time” (this pdf is attached in the file)
Choose any 2 sources from below:
1. Necessary Edges: Arts, Empathy, and Education” by Yo-Yo Ma https://elishaemerson.uneportfolio.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/400/2018/09/YoYoMaNecessaryEdges.pdf
2. The Animals: Practicing Complexity” by Michael Pollan https://edibleschoolyard.org/sites/default/files/Joel%20Salatin%20Reading_Michael%20Pollan.pdf