comic sans courier ezra sil georgia sbl hebrew simplified arabic tahoma times new roman traditional arabic trebuchet verdana 돋움 W r i t i n g
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
RESEARCH PROJECT
Your paper should be at least 1,200 words and include all of the 5 sets of sources listed below.
Based on your Research Proposal, this project will represent the culmination of your study of the End of Life Issues in this course, and will enable you to explore a specific topic of interest from the perspective of one of the social or behavioral sciences. Your paper should include the various sources that you collected in your proposal. All sources should convey information that is integrated into your paper:
1. A source regarding your discipline of choice 2. At least one resource from our course 3. At least two scholarly sources 4. At least one organizational source 5. (optional) Any additional sources that you would like to include that are relevant to your topic.
Please be sure to see the feedback on your proposal to help you successfully complete this project, and feel free to contact me with any questions as you are working on it.
Your paper should be a coherent essay that develops an argument related to your topic of research. It should NOT be a list of concepts and sources related to the topic.
Your paper should include:
1. Introduction
2. Body of the paper. The paper should provide relevant details and also convey how your paper is related to the social science discipline identified in your proposal.
3. Reflections. Include a paragraph about why this topic is significant and meaningful to you, as well as anything that you learned that you found especially interesting.
4. Conclusion
5. Reference List
Important: All sources should be cited within the paper, using APA style (7th Ed.). Refer to the APA Citations and Style module in the classroom for APA resources.
Your research project will be graded according to the attached rubric (also available in the syllabus).
Rubric Name: BEHS 380: Rubric for Research Project
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Key materialCompleted
2 points
More information needed
1.6 points
Significant information is needed
1.2 points
Information is completely missing
0 points
Criterion Score
Introduction
Introductory paragraph gives excellent overview of the paper to be presented and includes key details.
Introduction gives general sense of the paper, but more details would help the reader focus on the paper’s content.
Introduction is extremely general and/or very short.
No paragraph is included
/ 2
Academic discipline highlighted in the paper is clearly explained
The academic discipline is well explained and the explanation is accurate. A citation is included.
Most of the information is included and is accurate, but some refinement/correction is needed.
The discipline is mentioned and discussed generally, but the paragraph needs to be more specific and to include more information.
The academic discipline is not discussed.
/ 2
Personal Reflection
Student clearly conveys the significance of the project to him/her, providing some key details.
Student discusses the significance of the project, but more details would highlight the significance.
Student mentions the significance of the project in passing.
Not included
/ 2
Conclusion
Concluding paragraph gives excellent overview of the paper that has been presented and includes key details.
Concluding paragraph gives general sense of the paper, but more details would help the reader identify the paper’s significance.
Conclusion is extremely general and/or very short.
Not included
/ 2
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Body of paperExcellent
8 points
Very good
7.2 points
Good
6.4 points
Acceptable/Needs Improvement
5.6 points
Needs significant improvement
0 points
Criterion Score
Presents overall argument that conveys the main points of the discussion
Key information is provided on the topic chosen. Meaningful details are provided on this topic that brings the paper to life.
Key points related to the topic are well-described, though more specific details would enhance the explanation.
The basics of the topic are adequately presented; more details would bring the paper to life. The details provided are minimal. There may be some gaps in the explanation.
The topic is described in general, with very few details. It may not be clear how the details provided are connected to the topic.
There are no details about the topic. Paper is completely off-topic.
/ 8
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Relevant Course ResourceIncluded
0.75 points
Not included
0 points
Criterion Score
Relevant resource from course identified
Included
Not included
/ 0.75
Resource is used in a meaningful way
Included
Not included
/ 0.75
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Relevant OrganizationIncluded
0.75 points
Not included
0 points
Criterion Score
Relevant organization identified, including URL
Included
Not included
/ 0.75
Relevant organization is used in a meaningful way
Included
Not included
/ 0.75
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Scholarly article 1Included
0.75 points
Not included
0 points
Criterion Score
Relevant scholarly resource is identified
Included
Not included
/ 0.75
Resource is used in a meaningful way
Included
Not included
/ 0.75
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Scholarly article 2Included
0.75 points
Not included
0 points
Criterion Score
Relevant scholarly resource is identified
Included
Not included
/ 0.75
Resource is used in a meaningful way
Included
Not included
/ 0.75
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Writing and ReferencesExcellent
1 point
Needs some improvement
0.8 points
Needs significant improvement
0 points
Criterion Score
Effective Writing
Paper is clear, well-written, and has minimal spelling/grammar issues.
Writing is generally clear, but there are multiple typos, spelling errors, and/or grammar issues.
Writing is very unclear .with many errors.
/ 1
APA style citations within text
Sources are cited within the text in APA style, with the author and year listed. Citation style may not be perfect, but it is close.
Some of the citation information is presented, but some is missing.
There are no citations.
/ 1
APA style reference list
Reference list of sources cited is included at the end of the paper in APA style. Reference formatting may not be perfect, but it is close.
The references are included at the end of the paper, but they are not formatted to APA style and/or much of the reference info is missing.
There is no reference list.
/ 1
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Project LengthProject has an appropriate word count
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount