600 words ), times new roman W r i t i n g
ArgumentativeEssay(Final)AssignmentInstructions
For this assignment, work your way through the revision andproofreading stages of your writing process, and submit yourfinal version.
AssignmentInstructions
1. Review the grading rubric as listed on the following page.
2. Work through the revision stage of the writing process.
3. Work through the proofreading stage of the writing process.
4. Create a final version of your Argument Essay according to the following. Papers submitted that do not meet the requirements will be returned to you ungraded.
o Minimum of 2 to 3 typed, double-spaced pages (about 500-600 words), Times New Roman, 12 pt font size (not including the Works Cited page.
o MLA formatting (see the MLA Format page as needed)
o Submitted as either a .doc, .docx, .rtf file with your first and last name in the file name.
5. Submit your final version of your Argument Essay as a single file upload.
Grading Rubric: Argument Essay—Final Draft
Criteria |
Ratings |
Point Total: 100 |
Ideas |
30 pts: The paper demonstrates outstanding idea development. 24 pts: The paper demonstrates above average idea development. 22 pts: The writer sufficiently defines the topic, even though development is still basic or general. 18 pts: The paper has an idea that needs to be developed. 0 pts: There is no coherent idea. |
30 pts |
Content |
30 pts: The paper demonstrates outstanding evidence of supporting the main point. 24 pts: The paper demonstrates above average evidence of supporting the main point. 22 pts: The paper demonstrates sufficient support of the main point. 18 pts: The paper requires more supporting evidence of the main point. 0 pts: There is little content supporting the main idea. |
30 pts |
Organization |
30 pts: The organization is outstanding and showcases the central theme. The presentation of information is compelling. 26 pts: The organizational structure is above average. 20 pts: The organizational structure is strong enough to move the reader through the text without too much confusion. 16 pts: The writing needs a clearer sense of direction. The internal structure is weak. 0 pts: The organization is poor. |
30 pts |
Word Choice, Sentence Fluency, Conventions |
10 pts: The writer demonstrates an outstanding word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions. 6 pts: The writer demonstrates above average word choice selection, flow and cadence, with well-built sentences and strong grasp of standard writing conventions. 4 pts: The writer demonstrates sufficient selection of words. The text tends to be more mechanical and contains some errors of standard writing conventions. 2 pts: The writer demonstrates a limited vocabulary and lack of fluidity. Errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, usage and grammar repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read. 0 pts: No marks. |
10 pts |
CC LICENSED CONTENT, ORIGINAL
▪ Provided by:LumenLearning.Located at:http://lumenlearning.com/.License:CC BY: Attribution
CC LICENSED CONTENT, SHARED PREVIOUSLY
▪ Authored by:DarylSmithO’HareandSusanC.Hines.Providedby:ChadronStateCollege.Project:KaleidoscopeOpenCourseInitiative.License:CC BY: Attribution
▪ Authored by:PaulPowell.Provided by:CentralCommunityCollege.Project:KaleidoscopeOpenCourseInitiative.License:CC BY: Attribution
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount